AVAST OR BITDEFENDER RANSOMWARE SOFTWARE
AVAST OR BITDEFENDER RANSOMWARE PC
AVAST OR BITDEFENDER RANSOMWARE SERIES

This added up to a total protection score of 34 points instead of 36. While Malwarebytes Premium did identify all threats, it experienced the problem in two instances so that in the end, encryption did occur.

AVAST OR BITDEFENDER RANSOMWARE PC

The following products achieved the maximum protection score of 36 points in all 10 attack scenarios: Bitdefender Internet Security, F-Secure SAFE, G Data Total Security, Kaspersky Internet Security, Microsoft Defender, Microworld eScan Internet Security Suite, PC Matic, Quick Heal Total Security and VIPRE AdvancedSecurity. In the Advanced Threat Protection test of the 15 Internet security solutions, 9 of the 15 packages demonstrated that they effectively protected against ransomware in actual conditions. Those achieving lower scores experienced problems in one or more scenarios.ДЇor consumer users: the November result of the Advanced Threat Protection tests In the current November test, the products subjected to 10 attacks could achieve a possible 36 points for a maximum protection score. If the last field is highlighted in orange, everything was encrypted (files encrypted). In terms of ransomware, this means that some, but not all, of the files were encrypted (some files encrypted). If there is an orange field at the end of the chart, the attack is considered undetected, whereas a yellow field indicates only partial detection of the attack. If a field remains orange, the corresponding test item is considered unsuccessful (no detection). As an easier overview, the field in the chart is then highlighted in green. If an assault is completely thwarted under one of the first two steps 'Initial Access' or 'Execution', the attack is considered successfully prevented, and a product receives the maximum points toward its protection score (3 to 4).

AVAST OR BITDEFENDER RANSOMWARE SOFTWARE

The chart clearly shows all the steps of an attack scenario and how the protection software reacts. All of the steps registered in the lab are later spelled out in the evaluation charts, which are modeled after a MITRE ATT&CK matrix graphic.

In the Advanced Threat Protection tests, detection is only the first step recorded in the overall test regimen. In the classic tests involving malware prevention, there is always only the result 'attacker identified' or 'attacker not identified'. 28 protection packages put to the test: ransomware can also be fended off It is always dependent on the type of scenario and the number of steps evaluated in each phase, for which points are awarded accordingly.

It should be noted that the maximum point score in Advanced Threat Protection differs from test to test. The overview tables of the 15 and 13 tested protection solutions respectively show the summarized evaluation of the 10 attacks and the maximum achievable score of 36 points in this November test. The products involved were from Avast, Bitdefender (two versions), Comodo, F-Secure, G DATA, Kaspersky, Malwarebytes, Microsoft, Seqrite, Sophos, Symantec and VMware. The evaluation clearly shows that detection of malware alone does not always protect against the consequence of partial or complete encryption.ДЎ5 well-known protection packages for consumer users from the manufacturers Avast, AVG, Bitdefender, BullGuard, F-Secure, G DATA, Kaspersky, Malwarebytes, Microsoft, Microworld, Norton, PC Matic,, Quick Heal and VIPRE Security were put to the test.ДЇor corporate users, 13 endpoint solutions underwent a test regimen. In ten defined scenarios, the testers explain step-by-step how the attacks unfold and what happens in between.

AVAST OR BITDEFENDER RANSOMWARE SERIES

In its series of so-called Advanced Threat Protection tests, the lab at AV-TEST put 15 well-known Internet security suites for consumer users and 13 solutions for corporate users to the test under Windows 10.

Avast or bitdefender ransomware